P2 Reflection
- Cory Kuchta
- Mar 26, 2018
- 1 min read
From creating project 2, I learned that sometimes my sentences can be too lengthy. I try to articulate exactly what I am trying to say with detail but doing so leads to some run-ons. However, with the feedback of my group members, I remedied those situations. I will translate this into project 3 by being more concise with some of my writing. Additionally, I also learned that my writing may not be as effective after a first draft as I thought and heavy review is necessary to get the best final product possible. I also enjoyed translating the research I did into my paper. The process of taking published, peer reviewed reports that can be used to support my own arguments is definitely an enjoyable phenomenon for me. Regarding peer feedback, I will be sure to be thorough with the feedback I give my team members. In project 1, neglected to be detailed in my feedback and regretted it after realizing how much my team members feedback helped me. In project 3, I will definitely provide thorough feedback to my team members like I did in project 2 and like they did for me. In terms of revision, I will be sure to give myself time in between the composition stage of writing and the revision stage. I believe that having some time to focus on other things before revising allows my brain to be fresh when I decide to begin revising. Cross-referencing my group member’s feedback with my own and allowing some time before the revision is my plan of action on effective revising.
Comments